| Post |
Author |
|
Posted: Jan 15, 2025 04:21:16
Subject: dgpk Child marriage thriving in UK due to legal loophole,
|
|
|
Ywyz Hollywood comes to the high court for Johnny Depp face-off
Government scientific advisers are furious at what they see as an attempt to censor their advice on government proposals during the Covid-19 lockdown by heavily redacting an official report before it was released to the public, the Guardian can reveal.The report was one of a series of documents published by the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies Sage this week to mollify growing criticism about the lack of transparency over the advice given to ministers responding to the coronavirus.However, large blocks of text in the report, produced by SPI-B, the Sage subcommittee providing advice from behavioural scientists on how the public might respond to lockdown measures, <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.at>stanley becher</a> were entirely blanked out.Several SPI?? members told the Guardian that the redacted portions of the document contained criticisms they had made of potential government policies they had been formally asked to consider in late March and early April.One SPI-B adviser said: It is bloody silly, and completely counterproductive. A second committee member said: The impression Im getting is this government doesnt want any criticism. On Friday afternoon, after the Guardian revealed frustrations over the r <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.es>stanley taza</a> edacted report, another member of the governments advisory committee took to Twitter to complain of what he said was Stalinist censorship. Personally, I am more bemused than furious, said Stephen Reicher, a profess <a href=https://www.stanley-mugs.us>stanley thermos mug</a> or of social psychology at the University of St Andrews. The greatest asset we have in this cris Hihu Homophobic hate crime reports soar but charges fall
The Ministry of Defence lobbied behind closed doors to restrict the provision of legal aid to claimants questioning the treatment of military detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan, the high co <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.ro>stanley cup</a> urt has heard.At a hearing challenging changes to legal aid made last year, Tim Otty QC said tighter controls on funding judicial reviews now imposed by the Ministry of Justice would have prevented courts hearing torture allegations and the creation of extra safeguards to protect suspects.Repeated representations by the former defence minister, Bob Ainsworth, to the Ministry of Justice during 2008 and 2009 were not disclosed during a public consultation exercise on changing legal aid entitlements, he said.The changes came at a time when the government was suffering successive political embarrassments over claims that al-Qaida suspects had been subjected to torture overseas w <a href=https://www.mugs-stanley.us>stanley website</a> hile being questioned by the intelligence services.There was no candid disclosure of the real reasons for restricting funding and the process was therefore legally flawed , Otty added. The Ministry of Justice treated the MoD s concerns as central to its approach. In o <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.de>stanley cup deutschland</a> ne email sent in June 2009, the high court heard, there was an express indication that the MoJ supported the concerns raised and would act on them speedily. The genesis for these <changes>to legal aid] rest solely in concerns expressed by the MoD ??and in terms of the cost burdens from judicial reviews rela
|
|
admin
|
|
|
|
 |
|
